"I'd have taken
this to the Air Force Inspector General (IG)!" I did !...Here's
what the IG had to say...And still the facts are: 1) The numbers
I reported were correct, and 2) I didn't use the data line to make phone
calls.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
WASHINGTON DC
February 12, 1996
SAF/IGQ
1140 Air Force Pentagon
Washington DC 20330-1140
Technical Sergeant Allen A. Lamb
XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX
Tucson AZ 85711
Sergeant Lamb
This is in final response to your correspondence to this office regarding your treatment
in recruiting duty, possible reprisal and several unrelated matters which you presented near the
conclusion of the initial inquiry.
First, we apologize for the length of time taken to conclude this inquiry. There were
several issues which our office felt required further investigation and explanation before closure
of this case. To accomplish this, further work on the part of HQ AETC and several additional
legal reviews were required.
What was most disturbing in the actions taken in this matter was the magnitude of
administrative action taken by your commander. We found in most cases (similar to yours),
administrative actions (LOR, including Article 15) were common and relief from recruiting
duties almost always followed. However, withhold from promotion seem in our estimation to
be unduly severe under the circumstances of your case. However, after reexamination and
additional legal review, although we do not agree with the commander's action to withhold, it
was determined your commander was within his authority to withhold your promotion. The
action by the commander fell within acceptable legal options within this matter, and although
not commensurate with action taken on others, the withhold is permissible if the commander
deems it necessary. Because there is no finding for reprisal or unfair treatment, there is no
grounds to question the motive or intent of the commander's decision.
Regarding the counter testimony by a personal acquaintance that she over heard the
commander indicate the squadron would "find" something to use to remove you and
allegations of beer drinking at a federal building. The inquiry found no other testimony or
credible evidence to collaborate the testimony of your acquaintance regarding making you a
target for dismissal. Like testimony from other witnesses refute the allegation. Unfortunately,
this matter can not be resolved either way and therefore can not be a deciding factor in the
findings. The matter relating to the consumption of alcohol in a federal building and your
actions to bring this matter to proper authorities was provided to appropriate command
officials for follow-up action. It was determined your disclosure of this event had no impact on
the actions taken on you.
We regret this is not the answer you hoped for. We recommend you seek further
redress of the promotion issue through the Air Force Board of Correction of Military
Records (AFBCMR) for a review of your case. The AFBCMR is the highest echelon of
administrative appeal within the Air Force and is empowered to make such recommendations
to the Secretary of the Air Force, as deemed appropriate. Application to the AFBCMR is
accomplished by submitting the attached DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military
Record to:
Air Force Board Correction Military Record
SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742
The AFBCMR considers each case based on the evidence submitted by the petitioner
and the final determination is based on the data submitted. We wish you luck with your
petition to the AFBCMR. Attached for your use is a Summary Report of Review regarding
this case.
XXX X. XXX, Major, USAF
Chief, Inquiries Policy
Inquiries Directorate
Attachment:
DD Form 149
Return to Airminder's All About Air Force Recruiting Page.
You are visitor
since 5 Apr 97.